Seniors Must Jump Through Hoops for Prescription Drugs

Seniors Must Jump Through Hoops for Prescription Drugs
By Matthew Rothschild

November 15, 2005

Bush’s prescription drug plan is forcing millions of seniors to become gymnasts.

They’re going to have jump through all sorts of hoops to get the benefit, and if they decide it’s too much trouble, they’ll get socked with penalties if they ever try to join the program again.

Rather than offer free prescription drugs to everyone, and having the government bargain bulk discounts with the pharmaceutical companies for the entire Medicaid and Medicare population, Bush is subsidizing the drug companies and forcing seniors, starting this week, to evaluate a whole range of different private plans.

And none of them is free. In fact, seniors will be shelling out about $3,600 a year, not counting premiums, for the first $5,100 in prescriptions in 2006. These plans will then pick up 95 percent of the costs of any additional drugs. (See AARP) Drug companies and health insurers love Bush’s plan. “It’s a kind of a gold rush,” said Jonathan Oberlander, author of “The Political Life of Medicare,” in an article on the AARP website.

But for seniors, it’s a tricky hoops course. Each senior (or the care-provider for that senior) will have to figure out which private plan is best.

More than two million of these seniors are mentally handicapped, according to a Congressional advisory study cited in The New York Times.

They’re not going to be competent to figure this out.

And it’s going to be difficult for almost everybody else.

For instance, I live in Dane County, Wisconsin, and there are eight private plans for people here to choose from. Medicare has put out a chart on the Internet comparing them, but it’s Greek to me.

A senior would have no way of knowing whether the drugs he or she needs are covered by those plans, or why one plan would be better than another.

And for people who can’t navigate the Internet--and many seniors, like my parents, cannot—it’s going to be next to impossible to gather all the relevant information.

Seniors, or their sons and daughters who care for them, are going to have to do hours and hours of research to try to figure this out. And they may not come up with the best answer.

Bush is causing an endless amount of anxiety for seniors who don’t know what to do right now.

They have enough anxiety in their lives already. They don’t need any more.

Why I Don't Like the Fourth of July

Unemployment Figures Underscore Need for New Stimulus

Julie Bolz,

My guest this week is Julie Bolz, a women's rights and human rights activist, who has built or repaired dozens of schools in Afghanistan.
MP3 Download |

Shepard Fairey, Citizen Artist

The maker of the iconic “Hope” poster has turned frustration and anger into inspiration.

Changing Obama's Mindset

Obama has to be pulled in the right direction.

Pete Rose Hits it Around

Want to feel old? Pete Rose just turned sixty-eight. Want to feel young? Talk baseball with Pete Rose.

Naomi Klein Interview

“We don’t have a right to be disappointed” by Obama, says the author of The Shock Doctrine.
Sign up for e-mail updates
Links from the Editors
The United States’ Anti-Democratic Pattern in Honduras [link]
Progressivism is Mainstream [link]
The Banks Own Congress [link]
U.S. Evangelicals join the nuclear-weapon-free world movement [link]
Netanyahu Speaks; The Israel-Palestine Ball Remains in Obama's Court [link]
[link] Why Feingold Opposed McChrystal


About

The Progressive Magazine since 1909. Home of Howard Zinn, Barbara Ehrenreich, Ruth Conniff, radio, video, and Matthew Rothschild's McCarthyism Watch.

Since its founding by Sen. Robert La Follette, The Progressive has steadfastly opposed corporate power and reckless U.S. interventionism and has championed peace, women's rights, civil rights, civil liberties, a preserved environment, an independent media, and real democracy.

Copyright 2009, The Progressive Magazine. All Rights Reserved.