Miers and the Right

Miers and the Right
By Matthew Rothschild

October 12, 2005

I’m trying hard to figure out the intensity of the far right’s anger about the Harriet Miers nomination.

Seems unlikely to me, anyway, that Bush and Cheney and Rove would have picked someone who was not a doctrinaire conservative.

So why are the reactionaries reacting so badly?

Because Harriet Miers was not one of their tried and true chosen few.

She hasn’t been out there openly fighting their battles from the trenches or the benches, so they, having been stung by Souter and O’Connor and Kennedy, badly fear being stung again.

They also feel their power slipping away, as Bush’s popularity stays low, his ability to get what he wants in Congress begins to flag, the Iraq War drags on, and indictments loom.

They were depending on Bush to deliver a reactionary bench, and now they fear they won’t be able to accomplish this overriding goal.

Bush’s preachers—especially James Dobson—pledged that he would stack the court with justices committed to overturning Roe. While Dobson may be reassured, many rightwingers feel betrayed.

Which is strange, since Bush has done so much for them.

But part of the betrayal is feeling disrespected: One rightwing fundamentalist leader said it’s like Bush doesn’t want to be seen in public with them.

And part of the betrayal is feeling that Bush has not joined the battle in the way they want: head on.

They crave jihad, and Harriet Miers doesn’t seem like a bomb thrower.

For many rightwing fundamentalists, it’s not enough that they stack the court. They also want justices to berate the rest of us as sinners as they take their seats.

And so, on Sunday, Pat Buchanan was demanding that Harriet Miers must call Roe an “abomination” at her confirmation hearings.

I doubt that will happen.

But Miers is in a bind: If she doesn’t unsheath the anti-abortion sword, she may lose a couple of rightwing Republican Senators. And if she does, she may lose a couple of moderate Republican Senators.

Until the Miers nomination, all Bush had, solidly at his table, was the far right.

He doesn’t even have that now, despite all his catering.

Why I Don't Like the Fourth of July

Unemployment Figures Underscore Need for New Stimulus

Julie Bolz,

My guest this week is Julie Bolz, a women's rights and human rights activist, who has built or repaired dozens of schools in Afghanistan.
MP3 Download |

Shepard Fairey, Citizen Artist

The maker of the iconic “Hope” poster has turned frustration and anger into inspiration.

Changing Obama's Mindset

Obama has to be pulled in the right direction.

Pete Rose Hits it Around

Want to feel old? Pete Rose just turned sixty-eight. Want to feel young? Talk baseball with Pete Rose.

Naomi Klein Interview

“We don’t have a right to be disappointed” by Obama, says the author of The Shock Doctrine.
Sign up for e-mail updates
Links from the Editors
The United States’ Anti-Democratic Pattern in Honduras [link]
Progressivism is Mainstream [link]
The Banks Own Congress [link]
U.S. Evangelicals join the nuclear-weapon-free world movement [link]
Netanyahu Speaks; The Israel-Palestine Ball Remains in Obama's Court [link]
[link] Why Feingold Opposed McChrystal


About

The Progressive Magazine since 1909. Home of Howard Zinn, Barbara Ehrenreich, Ruth Conniff, radio, video, and Matthew Rothschild's McCarthyism Watch.

Since its founding by Sen. Robert La Follette, The Progressive has steadfastly opposed corporate power and reckless U.S. interventionism and has championed peace, women's rights, civil rights, civil liberties, a preserved environment, an independent media, and real democracy.

Copyright 2009, The Progressive Magazine. All Rights Reserved.